Bealls list of predatory publishers is still available but the journal list and his site have been shut down - the publisher list will become dated quite quickly. Cabell's list is an alternative but access will not be free.
A site called 'Think check submit' provides criteria by which to assess a journal.
Visibility is about where you are publishing and who is citing your work. Various measures have been devised to assess visibility or impact and these are the subject of much debate. Visibility is heightened if one is publishing in international journals, and in the sciences.
Visibility in the humanities and social sciences and particularly where publishing is restricted to South African journals is more difficult to establish.
Where can you go to see your visibility / who is citing your work?
Web of Knowledge - not only provides traditional search functionality by author, title, keywords etc, but also allows citation searching - who has cited whom, where and how many times. You may check your H-index here. Few SA journals appear in this database. There are 3 collections in WOS: for sciences, social sciences and humanities and arts.
GoogleScholar - beware, citations are often high - thought to be due to problematic metadata.
Publish or perish (harvests Google Scholar data) - been developed for the social sciences, humanities. The link takes you to a page that explains the site, provides the download and how to use tutorials.
Scopus - Social sciences not as well covered as the pure Sciences.
Visibility of journals is often measured by a journal's impact factor: the frequency of citations to articles published in a particular journal. The major tool is JCR: Journal Citation Reports published by Thomson Reuters. This site contains explanations of how journals are evaluated.
Click here for a Youtube that explains impact factors in terms of JCR and choosing a journal to publish.
One of the alternatives to the JCR is SNIP: Source Normalized Impact per Paper which takes into consideration the context of the citations ie the characteristics of the subject field. The developer of SNIP explains this metric in an article in the Journal of Informetrics
There are various ways of measuring the impact and quantity of an individual's research performance. All have advantages and disadvantages. Some of the more common are listed below:
A helpful guide produced by The University Auckland Library will help you find your h-index on various platforms.
Researchers and institutions need to make their research output visible in order to indicate their contribution to knowledge production, be accountable for funding and reap rewards in terms of personal and international recognition. Institutional repositories provide open access to primary research, most notably theses.
Whilst controversial, different tools exist to rank institutions using various measures.
InCites - a citation-based evaluation tool that measures institutional strengths, research productivity etc.
A critique of the two most visible measures: THE and Shanghai